Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Dear Students
Here are some important questions and answers of new prose "The Interview". Hope these will be helpful in your coming boards. If you want to give any suggestions, you are always welcome.

MULTIPLE CHOICE TYPE QUESTIONS
FLAMINGO –THE INTERVIEW (PROSE)
SL NO
QUESTIONS
ANSWER
TYPE
1
What has become a common place of journalism? 
  1. Interview
  2. Debate
  3. Survey
  4. literature
a. interview
Recall
2
Who feels that some people are wounded by interviews and lose a part of themselves?
  1. Lewis Carol
  2. Rudyard Kipling
  3. Christopher Silvester
  4. V.S Naipaul
d.  V.S Naipaul
Recall
3
What is semiotics?
  1. Study of syntax
  2. Study of letters
  3. Study of phonetics
  4. Study of signs

d. study of signs
Recall
4
Which book brought intellectual superstardom to Umberto Eco?
  1. Alice in Wonderland
  2. The Penguin Book of Interviews
  3. Jungle Book
  4. The Name of the Rose
d.  the Name of the Rose
Recall
5
What is ‘a lot of empty spaces in our lives’ called by Eco?
  1. Semiotics
  2. Metaphysics
  3. Interstices
  4. Theology
c. Interstices
Recall
6
Despite the drawbacks of the interview it is used as-
  1. Horror of the interviewer
  2. A supremely serviceable medium of communication
  3. A mode of satisfaction and amusement
  4. Condemnatory attitude towards the interviewer
b. A supremely serviceable medium of communication
Understanding
7
Who holds the position of unprecedented power and influence?
  1. The Reader
  2. The Interviewer
  3. The Interviewee
  4. The Publisher 
a. the Interviewer
Understanding
8
Why did Eco prefer to write essays that have narrative aspects?
  1.  Easy to conclude
  2. Easy to write
  3. Provides a way of creative writing
  4. Provides an escape from journalism
c. Provides a way of creative writing
Understanding
9
What makes ‘  The Name of the Rose’ a serious novel?
  1. It is a detective yarn
  2. It has no humour
  3. It is about history
  4. It is autobiographical
a.It is a detective yarn
Understanding
10
What does the expression ‘thumbprints on his windpipe’ mean?
  1. To be exhausted
  2. To be strangulated
  3. To be choked and suffocated
  4. To be depressed
c.   To be choked and suffocated
Understanding
11.
Why was Umberto Eco given an advance for 3000 copies only?
  1. Publisher could sell only 3000 copies
  2. Publisher didn’t expect to sell more than 3000 copies
  3. Eco wanted to sell 3000 copies
  4. Eco wanted to publish a few copies
b.   Publisher didn’t expect to sell more than 3000 copies
Apply
12
Who were the most puzzled with the success of Eco’s book?
  1. Readers and critics
  2. Eco and his friends
  3. Caroll and Kipling
  4. Journalists and publishers
d.   Journalists and publishers
Apply
13
Unlike Eco , what problem did Roland Barthes face?
  1. He was unable to write
  2. He was unable to write essays
  3. He was unable to do creative writing 
  4. He was unable to sell 3000 copies
c.   He was unable to do creative writing
Apply
14
What does Eco think of the readers of his novel ‘The Name of the Rose’?
  1. They like to have difficult reading experiences
  2. They like to have easy reading experiences
  3. They read whatever suits them
  4. They enjoy all genres of writing
b.   They like to have easy reading experiences
Apply
15
Despite being spectacularly famous after the publication of ‘The Name of Rose’ with whom does Eco identify himself?
  1. Novelist’s community
  2. Academic community
  3. Readers’ community
  4. Journalism community
b.   Academic community
Apply









FILL UPS/SENTENCE COMPLETION TYPE QUESTIONS
FLAMINGO - THE INTERVIEW(PROSE)
SL NO
QUESTIONS
ANSWER
TYPE
1
Celebrities despise the interviews as an …………………… into their lives. 
unwarranted intrusion
Recall
2
Eco acquired superstardom with the publication of ……………………
The Name of the Rose
Recall
3
Joseph Stalin described interviews as being like ……………… on his windpipe. 
thumbprints 
Recall
4
Since its invention ………………… have become a common place of journalism 
interviews
Recall
5
With the expansion of journalism, unprecedented power and influence lies with the ………………………..
interviewer
Understanding
6
According to Eco, empty spaces in our lives are…………………………
interstices 
Recall

7
In today’s world…………………… is our chief source of information about celebrities. 
Interview
Understanding
8
Despite acquiring a formidable reputation as a scholar, Eco turned to writing …………………. 
fiction 
Understanding
9
Eco’s first doctoral dissertation was appreciated by his professor as he presented it like a …………………………..
story 
Understanding
10
Joseph Stalin was a great……………… revolutionary and an active political organiser. 
russian 
Recall
11
Eco’s philosophical interests are in peace and …………………………….
non-violence 
Recall
12
Eco wrote over 40 scholarly works of ……………….
non fiction 
Recall
13

Like in some primitive cultures taking photographs is considered like stealing one’s soul, some celebrities feel that interviews ……………… them.
diminish 
Understanding
14
Rudyard Kipling considered interviews as an assault; however, he did the same with …………………….
Mark Twain
Understanding
15
Despite being a frequent interviewee ,…………………. referred to the interviewing ordeal.
H.G Wells
Recall









REFERENCE TO CONTEXT TYPE QUESTIONS
FLAMINGO - THE INTERVIEW(PROSE)
SL NO
QUESTIONS
ANSWER
TYPE
1
Some might make quite extravagant claims for it as being, in its highest form, a source of truth, and, in its practice, an art. Others,
usually celebrities who see themselves as its victims, might
despise the interview as an unwarranted intrusion into
their lives, or feel that it somehow diminishes them, just
as in some primitive cultures it is believed that if one
takes a photographic portrait of somebody then one is
stealing that person’s soul
  1. Name the lesson.
  2. What are some of the positive views on interviews? 
  3. Why do celebrities despise interviews?
  4. What do some primitive cultures believe about being photograph?
  1. The Interview
  2. Source of truth/ art/ highest form
  3. Unwarranted intrusion into personal life
  4. One is stealing the persons soul
Recall/ understanding
2
The creator of Alice in
Wonderland, was said to have had ‘a just horror of the
interviewer’ and he never consented to be interviewed- it was his horror of being lionized which made him thus repel
would be acquaintances, interviewers, and the persistent
petitioners for his autograph and he would afterwards
relate the stories of his success in silencing all such people
with much satisfaction and amusement.
  1. Who is the creator of Alice in Wonderland
  2. Why didn’t he want to be interviewed?
  3. How did the creator of Alice in wonderland amuse himself? 
  4. Explain ‘horror of being lionized’.
  1. Lewis Carroll
  2. Horror of being lionized
  3. Relating the stories of his success in silencing others
  4. Fear of facing interviews in an enormous manner
Recall/ understanding
3
His wife, Caroline, writes in her diary for
14 October 1892 that their day was ‘wrecked by two reporters
from Boston’. She reports her husband as saying to the
reporters, “Why do I refuse to be interviewed? Because it
is immoral! It is a crime, just as much of a crime as an
offence against my person, as an assault, and just as much
merits punishment. It is cowardly and vile. No respectable
man would ask it, much less give it,”
  1. Who refused to be interviewed? 
  2. Why did he refuse to be interviewed?
  3. Give the antonym of ‘vile’.
  4. What happened on 14 October, 1892?
  1. Rudyard Kipling
  2. He felt it  was immoral/ crime/ assault
  3. Aesthetic
  4. Rudyard Kipling and his wife Caroline’s day was wrecked by two reporters
Understanding / apply
4
H. G. Wells in an interview in 1894
referred to ‘the interviewing
ordeal’, but was a fairly frequent
interviewee and forty years later
found himself interviewing Joseph Stalin. Saul Bellow
, who has consented to be interviewed
on several occasions, nevertheless
once described interviews as
being like thumbprints on his windpipe.
  1. What did H G Wells feel about interviews?
  2. How did Saul Bellow describe interviews?
  3. What does the expression, ‘thumbprints on windpipe’ mean?
  4. From the given extract, find the word that means the same as ‘trial’.
  1. He felt interviews were an ordeal
  2. Like thumb prints on his windpipe
  3. An aggressive invasion into one’s private life
  4. Ordeal 
Understanding/ apply
5
Aah, now that is more difficult to explain.
I have some philosophical interests and I pursue
them through my academic work and my novels.
Even my books for children are about non-violence
and peace...you see, the same bunch of ethical,
philosophical interests.
  1. Who is the speaker?
  2. What is difficult to explain?
  3. What are the philosophical interests of the speaker?
  4. What do you mean by the word ‘ethical’?
  1. Umberto Eco
  2. Giving impression of doing many things
  3. Non-violence and peace
  4. Decent/ righteous
Understanding/ apply
6
My American publisher said
while she loved my book, she didn’t expect to sell
more than 3,000 copies in a country where nobody
has seen a cathedral or studies Latin. So I was
given an advance for 3000 copies, but in the end it sold two or three million in the U.S.
  1. Who is the speaker?
  2. Which novel sold two to three million copies?
  3. Why did the American publisher not expect to sell more than 3000 copies?
  4. Why was the novel successful? 
  1. Umberto Eco
  2. The Name of the Rose
  3. As she felt the Americans would not be interested in cathedral or Latin
  4. Detective yarn/ mystery/ people don’t like easy experiences
Understanding/ apply
7
Not everyone can do that of course. Your
non-fictional writing, your scholarly work has a
certain playful and personal quality about it. It is
a marked departure from a regular academic
style — which is invariably depersonalised and
often dry and boring. Have you consciously adopted
an informal approach or is it something that just
came naturally to you.
  1. Name the lesson.
  2. Who is the speaker?
  3. What are the characteristic traits of regular academic style?
  4. What is the marked quality of the listener’s scholarly work?




  1. The Interview
  2. Mukund
  3. Depersonalised and often dry and boring
  4. informal approach/ playful and personal quality
Understanding/ apply
8
When I presented my first Doctoral
dissertation in Italy, one of the Professors said,
“Scholars learn a lot of a certain subject, then they
make a lot of false hypotheses, then they correct them
and at the end, they put the conclusions. You, on the
contrary, told the story of your research. Even including
your trials and errors.” At the same time, he recognised
I was right and went on to publish my dissertation as
a book, which meant he appreciated it
  1. Who is the speaker?
  2. How do most scholars carry out their research work?
  3. How was the speaker contrary to most scholars?
  4. How do we know that the Professor appreciated the work?
  1. Umberto Eco
  2. False Hypotheses and conclusions 
  3. Told his research as a story
  4. Published the dissertation as a book
Understanding/ apply
9
Yet despite the
drawbacks of the interview, it is
a supremely serviceable medium
of communication. “These days, more than at any other time,
our most vivid impressions of our contemporaries are throughinterviews,” Denis Brian has written. “Almost everything of moment reaches us through one man asking questions of another. Because of this, the interviewer holds a position of unprecedented power and influence.”
  1. What are the drawbacks of interviews?
  2. How has interview become a supremely serviceable medium of communication?
  3. What does Denis Brian feel about interviews?
  4. Name the lesson and author. 
  1. Unwarranted intrusion
  2. Vivid impressions of  contemporaries / gives a glimpse into the life of a person
  3. Unprecedented power and influence
  4. The Interview of Christopher Silvester
Understanding/ apply
10
At that point, at the age of 22, I understood
scholarly books should be written the way I had
done — by telling the story of the research. This is
why my essays always have a narrative aspect.
And this is why probably I started writing narratives
[novels] so late — at the age of 50, more or less.
  1. Who is the Speaker?
  2.  How did the speaker understand the way scholarly books should be written? 
  3. What aspect did his essays have?  
  4. By what age did he start writing narratives?
  1. Umberto Eco
  2. After his professor published the dissertation as a book
  3. Narrative aspect
  4. At the age of 50








No comments:

Post a Comment